New MLB100 978 MHz ADS-B In Receiver |
Post Reply | Page <1234 5> |
Author | ||||||||||||||
oskrypuch
Senior Member Joined: 09 Nov 2012 Location: CYFD Status: Offline Points: 3058 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I think Scott's question wasn't covered in the above. If I read him correctly, he wants to send GDL-69 weather AND the traffic only portion of the MLB100 output to the same IFD.
It was my impression that that was supported. Yes, No? * Orest |
||||||||||||||
AviJake
Admin Group Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Location: Lincoln MA Status: Offline Points: 2815 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
The list of weather products supported can be found here: http://www.avidyne.com/products/ifd540/ifd-weather.asp and then compare that to the table of supported MLB100 products in the pilot guide on page 3-27. (BTW, I'll update the webpage comparison to add MLB100 shortly) And here are some relevant snippets from the pilot guide: NOTE ADS-B US Weather Radar Data is Coarse When compared to subscription Datalink service data and even ADS-B Regional data, the CONUS weather radar data appears as a noticeably coarser depiction – this is a function of the supplied data. NOTE Weather Source Selection An individual IFD can only display ADS-B (e.g. “MLB100”) or Sirius/XM (e.g. “GDL-69”, “MLB700”, etc) weather at any given time. The choice to select the source is made at time of installation in the setup pages. TIPS AND TECHNIQUES Weather Overlays in Dual IFD Operations For those installations with dual IFDs and more than one type of weather source (e.g. GDL-69 and a MLB100) in the aircraft, Avidyne recommends wiring one weather source to one IFD and the other weather source to the second IFD TIPS AND TECHNIQUES Weather Overlays in Single IFD Operations For those installations with a single IFD and more than one type of weather source (e.g. GDL-69 and a MLB100) in the aircraft, Avidyne recommends wiring both weather sources to the IFD so that the higher priority weather overlay can display on the IFD and the lower priority weather data can be streamed out of the IFD via WiFi for display on a compatible tablet/wireless device application. The current display priority is GDL-69, MLB700, AV300/350, MLB100. NOTE Dissimilar Weather & Traffic Source Data Not Shared Dissimilar weather data sources (e.g. GDL-69 data on one IFD and MLB100 data on the other IFD) will not be shared between IFDs. Each IFD will display its own weather data in this case. Likewise, dissimilar traffic data sources (e.g. TAS600 data on one IFD and MLB100 data on the other IFD) will not be shared between IFDs. Each IFD will display its own traffic data in this case. NOTE Traffic Source Selection An individual IFD can only display ADS-B (e.g. “MLB100”) or sensor traffic (e.g. “TAS600”, “Skywatch”, etc) traffic at any given time. The choice to select the source is made at time of installation in the setup pages. TIPS AND TECHNIQUES Traffic Overlays in Dual IFD Operations For those installations with dual IFDs and more than one type of traffic source (e.g. “TAS600” and an ADS-B “MLB100”) in the aircraft, Avidyne recommends wiring one traffic source to one IFD and the other traffic source to the second IFD TIPS AND TECHNIQUES Traffic Overlays in Single IFD Operations For those installations with a single IFD and more than one type of traffic source (e.g. “TAS600” and an ADS-B “MLB100”) in the aircraft, Avidyne recommends wiring both traffic sources to the IFD so that the higher priority traffic overlay can display on the IFD and the lower priority traffic data can be streamed out of the IFD via WiFi for display on a compatible tablet/wireless device application. The current display priority is TAS6XX/TCAD, Skywatch, Other ARINC429 Traffic sensor, MLB100. |
||||||||||||||
Steve Jacobson
sjacobson@avidyne.com |
||||||||||||||
Gring
Senior Member Joined: 30 Dec 2011 Location: Kingston, NY Status: Offline Points: 722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
It is true that the NEXRAD weather display from the paid for subscription services like XM and SIRIUS has better resolution than the FIS-B weather from ADS-B. This is particularly true when you look at weather beyond 250 miles where the FIS-B switches to a more corse resolution. Depending on your level of paid subscription you may see additional products with FIS-B, but even the least expensive XM and SIRIUS have TFR information.
You cannot split products for display on the IFD540, but if you have two devices, you can put the paid subscription on one unit and FIS-B on the other. |
||||||||||||||
scott
Groupie Joined: 21 Aug 2013 Location: Danville, CA Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I am planning a 540/440/340/MLB100 install next month. I currently have a GDL69 and I was told today by my shop that the GDL69 with the Pro subscription will deliver more information such as TFRs and higher resolution nexrad than the free wx info than you get with the MLB100. Is that true? I was also told that I could keep the GDL69 and display weather from that but get traffic from the MLB100. Anyone know if it is possible to split the source of weather and traffic like that?
|
||||||||||||||
DavidBunin
Senior Member Joined: 20 May 2015 Location: Rockwall, TX Status: Offline Points: 742 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Jake, Do you know if selecting "MLB100 Wx" on the input port forces that port's output to also be "MLB100 Wx"? I thought the MLB/MLX series was going to use the ADSB(Avi) output? David
|
||||||||||||||
AviJake
Admin Group Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Location: Lincoln MA Status: Offline Points: 2815 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
That's correct. 10.1 adds a new 232 port selection called, "MLB100 Wx".
|
||||||||||||||
Steve Jacobson
sjacobson@avidyne.com |
||||||||||||||
DavidBunin
Senior Member Joined: 20 May 2015 Location: Rockwall, TX Status: Offline Points: 742 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Tom, Do you know what the input port data selection should be for the MLB100? I assume it is a choice that is not found in software 10.0.3? |
||||||||||||||
n7ifr
Senior Member Joined: 05 Aug 2013 Location: Scottsdale, Az Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Good News: Some MLB's have shipped. Mine was installed 2-days ago. Bad News: Without the 540 update v10.1, the MLB won't work - no traffic or weather!! So, TAS still working, but MLB dead in the water until 10.1 - ugh! Tom Wolf |
||||||||||||||
Suskej
Newbie Joined: 17 Apr 2015 Location: Florida Status: Offline Points: 22 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Have had the MLB100 on order for about a month now when is the MLB100 shipping to end users. My dealer says he cannot get a answer out of Avidyne. Any thoughts ?
|
||||||||||||||
sikhpilotmd
Groupie Joined: 08 Oct 2014 Location: KISP Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Any ship date yet?
|
||||||||||||||
n7ifr
Senior Member Joined: 05 Aug 2013 Location: Scottsdale, Az Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
David,
Thanks for your input. When my MX20 ChartView was active, I also had the iPad Jepp App, which is a good display of their plates for review. However, currently on my iPad, I use ForeFlight which has advanced well beyond the Jepp App with geo-referenced plates (NACO), etc. but, I agree the Aspen MFD NACO plate review is a bit cumbersome, despite showing more info on the leg altitudes. So, with the 540 Map/FMS pages with altitudes, I will revisit the 540 Jepp plate option - and play more on the iPad 540 App while I wait for the install. I agree with your synicism about Aspen/Avidyne possibly needing further financial gains for working out synergies among avionics. We will wait and see. Tom W. |
||||||||||||||
ddgates
Senior Member Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Deer Valley Status: Offline Points: 1100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Tom:
Could be a faulty assumption. /RANT - these guys should be working together to make equipment interoperable. That's what Capstone was for. They are not. Aspen will charge you a 2K unlock to use non Aspen input. Avidyne isn't coded AFAIK to accept non-MLB input. So that's the reality of the world in which we fly. /RANT IMO, if you have a 540, then the simplest path forward is an ATX340 and an MLB100. Guaranteed to play together, and gets you all you need for 2020. Having an "A" upgradable traffic system is a bonus - I have the same. The Jepp plates are far superior to NACO plates, and just as a suggestion, if you do the Jepp plates as a part of the package you get Jepp's iPad app Jepp FD. That is IMO the best place to look at plates. The synergy I see is: Get the 540's Jepp plates AND the iPad app Ultimately expect the 540 to work with some iPad app(s) through the 540 Wifi, hopefully for data and felt plan transfer (I would expect Avidyne is working with Jepp - they aren't telling) Let your Aspen plate subscription go - (I have them but don't find manipulating the field of view on the plate during an approach very simple) When you fly an approach, you can put the plate up on the 540 if you aren't carrying your iPad, but if you want traffic displayed during the approach, just look at the plate on the iPad. Best. David
Edited by ddgates - 02 May 2015 at 4:40pm |
||||||||||||||
David Gates
|
||||||||||||||
n7ifr
Senior Member Joined: 05 Aug 2013 Location: Scottsdale, Az Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Thanks David.
Well, with only a single 540, I am obsessing still about displaying NACO plate on Aspen MFD vs Jepp on the 540... I am also waiting for the "A" TAS upgrade to synchronize the active targets with ADS-B. But flying out in the "boonies", still need something to receive 980 IN in the absence of ADSB-R, hence the MLB100 (or other combo). I had no idea Aspen is wanting to charge for "unlock" card for outside ADS-B box like MLB100 to play on their toys! As an alternative to 1090 compliance, I am considering 980 compliance (I stay below 18,000msl), but I am unsure if the Aspen ATX100(G) will play on the Avidyne 540 for both traffic and Wx (graphical & Text). Assuming Avidyne isn't also charging for an "Unlock" using Aspen box... Tom W. |
||||||||||||||
n7ifr
Senior Member Joined: 05 Aug 2013 Location: Scottsdale, Az Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Aspen ATX100 (G) is already STC'd, using its internal GPS as WAAS position source.
Edited by n7ifr - 02 May 2015 at 4:09pm |
||||||||||||||
tony
Senior Member Joined: 06 Dec 2011 Location: Atlanta Status: Offline Points: 466 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
you better ask aspen if they planning on pursuing an STC using the configuration you are thinking about? if not, come 2020 you not be compliant with the mandate.
Edited by tony - 02 May 2015 at 2:06pm |
||||||||||||||
ddgates
Senior Member Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Deer Valley Status: Offline Points: 1100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I have two 540s so displaying plates on one and other things on the other is no biggie.
I also have an Aspen MFD which displays traffic- Aspen claims their MFD is going to display other vendor's Capstone output for wx - Quote from Beechtalk: "Yes an Aspen MFD should work with an aftermarket ADS-B receiver that uses the Capstone protocol. It will require a MFD unlock, which is currently priced at $2,000, to connect the non-Aspen ADS-B receiver. George Pariza Director of Product Marketing Aspen Avionics" --> Obviously they think a lot of their unlock card - at $2K it is $300 more than their announced price for their ARX-200, so clear that Aspen wants to sell you a box not a card. I have an MLB100 on order. Since I will have 1090 in on my TAS and I have ADS-B out from my AXP340, all I need is ADS-R which the MLB100 on 978 will give me. David
|
||||||||||||||
David Gates
|
||||||||||||||
n7ifr
Senior Member Joined: 05 Aug 2013 Location: Scottsdale, Az Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Dave,
Sorry, it took me a while to get back to your response on approach plates... I also have been using NACO plates on my Aspen MFD vs Jepp on MX20, and my only complaint has been that with Jepp plates activated, the plate will of course block any traffic & Wx viewed on the device. I also like to see the NACO altitudes on each leg, but with the 540, on Map or FMS screens, this will nicely be displayed. So, with your 540 I gather you do not find it distracting to view the plate in Chart mode, and lose the Map/FMS info (+ Wx/Traffic)... or have you figured a way to have Wx on your Aspen? Thanks for your feedback. Tom W. KDVT
|
||||||||||||||
n7ifr
Senior Member Joined: 05 Aug 2013 Location: Scottsdale, Az Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Not sure how much time delay this glitch introduces for the MLB100 Traffic display capability.
My 540 is in the shop for install next week. Since my Comanche will not likely fly above 18,000 mL, I am now considering 980Mhz ADS-B Compliance (with current GTX330 instead of 1090 Mhz with AXP340) using instead, the Aspen ATX100(G). Does anyone out there know if the Aspen ADS-B Transceivers will be play with Avidyne: . Synchronize with TAS605 (A) for combined Traffic on 540? . Display both Traffic & Wx on the 540? Thanks for any experience or advice. Tom W.
Edited by n7ifr - 02 May 2015 at 11:56am |
||||||||||||||
Gary T
Groupie Joined: 13 Nov 2013 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 80 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Found this (several years old DoD paper) on the web. I assume military planes use 1090 MHz. I believe they are monitoring ADS-B signals currently. Slow download pdf file. |
||||||||||||||
Gary-T
|
||||||||||||||
sikhpilotmd
Groupie Joined: 08 Oct 2014 Location: KISP Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
No much earlier
I recently did the G 500 upgrade, see my pic in BT I had the shop pre wire me for the MLB100 |
||||||||||||||
brou0040
Senior Member Joined: 13 Dec 2012 Location: KIYK Status: Offline Points: 720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Does anybody have insight into how ADS-B and the military aircraft in MOAs or restricted areas will work? What I think I'm understanding is that they are 1090. Do they have a requirement to transmit while in the MOA's, I assume they are governed by a different set of regulations than GA. If that's the case, that would seal the deal for me going dual in due to the high speed low level flights around here.
|
||||||||||||||
Joe Jet
Groupie Joined: 22 Dec 2013 Location: F70 Status: Offline Points: 73 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I did a factory direct pre buy on my first 540.
Bought the 540/340 package deal from Gulf Coast. Does that qualify? Not too excited about the MLB100 or the 340. The 1090out/978 in combo seems incomplete. In fact, I had put my 340 up for sale and am planning on getting the Sandia ADS-B in/out transponder instead. But, if Avidyne sends me an MLB100 then might stick with the 340 for now. Still waiting for my BT keyboards, but I guess that is timed with the 10.1 release. Edited by Joe Jet - 28 Apr 2015 at 10:55pm |
||||||||||||||
oskrypuch
Senior Member Joined: 09 Nov 2012 Location: CYFD Status: Offline Points: 3058 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Did you buy them in April? * Orest |
||||||||||||||
ddgates
Senior Member Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Deer Valley Status: Offline Points: 1100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Me too!
I also have a TAS605A!!! I want a free MLB....
|
||||||||||||||
David Gates
|
||||||||||||||
sikhpilotmd
Groupie Joined: 08 Oct 2014 Location: KISP Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
This just landed on my inbox
Free MLB 100 if you buy IFD 540/AXP 340 in April. I already have two IFD540s and AXP340 in my plane. Do I get a free MLB 100?
|
||||||||||||||
Paul
Senior Member Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Location: Massachusetts Status: Offline Points: 285 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I don't think you are confused. Your solution sounds correct to me. If you have an MLB100 you set your ADS-B out to announce only 978 MHz in. The Stratus will see multiple messages about some planes but it can deal wit that - as was pointed out it already needs to be able to deal with it.
|
||||||||||||||
brou0040
Senior Member Joined: 13 Dec 2012 Location: KIYK Status: Offline Points: 720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I don't know anything about the stratus, but I'd hope that it can sort it out because if you left your setup as both in and anybody else is in your puck that is 978 in only, you'll have the same problem.
|
||||||||||||||
jblodgett
Groupie Joined: 24 Sep 2013 Status: Offline Points: 62 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Boy, am I confused. Currently I have an IFD540 and AXP340. I also have a Stratus and an iPad. The AXP340 is set up to indicate that I have 1090/978 in. So if I get a MLB100 that means I won't receive ADS-B traffic from ground stations that originated from 1090 equipped aircraft because the ground station will assume I am receiving 1090 traffic directly? So in that circumstance I should change the AXP340 configuration to indicate 978 in only. That way the ground station will repeat on 978 all 1090 traffic as well as mode-C traffic so that it will be received on the MLB100. 978 traffic will be received directly by the MLB100. Is that correct? But that means the Stratus will receive both direct 1090 signals as well as 1090 signals repeated on 978 by the ground station. Maybe that is not a problem and the Stratus can sort out the multiple returns? Does all of this sound correct or am I missing something?
|
||||||||||||||
Paul
Senior Member Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Location: Massachusetts Status: Offline Points: 285 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I'd missed that. I agree, that sounds wrong. If you have ADS-B In on both frequencies the TIS-B will be sent to you on the UAT frequency. |
||||||||||||||
oskrypuch
Senior Member Joined: 09 Nov 2012 Location: CYFD Status: Offline Points: 3058 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
OK, so TIS-B and ADS-R are different concepts. Wasn't clear on that before.
Now, if you are 1090 OUT and want to receive on 978, you list 978 IN only. BUT, if you are 1090 OUT/IN (example AXP340 + upcoming TAS6xxA), then there appears to be no way to supply a portable in the cockpit, at least not from a portable 978 IN device. You'd need 1090 IN (or dual), or perhaps the IFD540 might serve as a traffic source on wifi then. * Orest Edited by oskrypuch - 23 Apr 2015 at 11:16pm |
||||||||||||||
brou0040
Senior Member Joined: 13 Dec 2012 Location: KIYK Status: Offline Points: 720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Slide 19 says "To be a TIS-B client an
aircraft must: .... • ADS-B In on only one link" This is what I think is wrong.
|
||||||||||||||
Paul
Senior Member Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Location: Massachusetts Status: Offline Points: 285 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I think the slides are correct. If an aircraft has dual-band ADS-B in the ground stations won't send ADS-R to it because it will receive all aircraft directly. However they will send TIS-B, which is the information about aircraft which do not have ADS-B out. So the aircraft will have all the known information about nearby traffic.
|
||||||||||||||
brou0040
Senior Member Joined: 13 Dec 2012 Location: KIYK Status: Offline Points: 720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I think I just answered my own question, I don't think the Avidyne material is correct, or I don't understand what they are trying to say. From the FAA ADS-B FAQ "The FAA ground system supports providing TIS-B and FIS-B services to these aircraft, and to any aircraft that may be equipped with dual-receive capability."
|
||||||||||||||
brou0040
Senior Member Joined: 13 Dec 2012 Location: KIYK Status: Offline Points: 720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
My understanding from Avidyne's ADS-B material is that with a dual band ADS-B solution, you won't see non-ADS-B equipped aircraft via TIS-B or ADS-R when near a ground station (slides 18 and 19) from http://www.avidyne.com/publications/guides/ADS-B-Overview.pdf. Unless you are in somebody else's non-dual puck, it's showing that you don't qualify for TIS-B or ADS-R, so how would you see non-ADS-B aircraft? Is this up to date and correct?
How do they know if you have a dual in receiver? If it's portable I'm sure it wouldn't matter, but if you have a certified unit, could you be required to somehow make that distinction via the installation instructions?
Edited by brou0040 - 23 Apr 2015 at 9:24pm |
||||||||||||||
flybikeski
Groupie Joined: 26 Feb 2015 Location: Placerville Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Well, the good thing is that Avidyne is at Sun-n-Fun and will be able to look around. It isn't hard to see where the market is heading in this area.
|
||||||||||||||
tony
Senior Member Joined: 06 Dec 2011 Location: Atlanta Status: Offline Points: 466 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
deleted
Edited by tony - 23 Apr 2015 at 7:43am |
||||||||||||||
jblodgett
Groupie Joined: 24 Sep 2013 Status: Offline Points: 62 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Respectfully, I believe that you need to listen to your customers about this. I believe that a dual-band receive only ADS-B solution is what the majority of Avidyne IFD-540 owners will want and will wait for. Word is getting out about the limitations of the single frequency receivers and given the high cost of installed ADS-B solutions I would expect that you will find limited market for them. I would like to see you move getting a dual band receiver certified higher up on your priority list.
Thanks, Jim Edited by jblodgett - 23 Apr 2015 at 10:17am |
||||||||||||||
AviJake
Admin Group Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Location: Lincoln MA Status: Offline Points: 2815 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Right. From the Pilot Guide, Install Manual and FAQs:
Plug and Play DetailsThe IFD is a “plug and play” replacement of the following equipment:
The following table represents the complete list of unsupported 530/530W functionality in the IFD:
|
||||||||||||||
Steve Jacobson
sjacobson@avidyne.com |
||||||||||||||
oskrypuch
Senior Member Joined: 09 Nov 2012 Location: CYFD Status: Offline Points: 3058 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Well, strictly speaking, it is compatible with a v4 GNS. It can't be compatible with features that were added after its development was frozen. Things might be added in future, but ADS-B is a particular issue when it comes to Garmin, they have implemented a proprietary data stream and won't share the construct with anyone. * Orest |
||||||||||||||
jblodgett
Groupie Joined: 24 Sep 2013 Status: Offline Points: 62 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
The IFD-540 is supposed to be a 100% compatible replacement for the GNS-530. That means that it should display traffic from a GDL-88 which can use a 530 as the display. Can you confirm that?
|
||||||||||||||
brou0040
Senior Member Joined: 13 Dec 2012 Location: KIYK Status: Offline Points: 720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
My understanding is that all Avidyne needs to do is to output their GPS position in the standard GNSS protocol. I believe that is ARINC743A, which is supported by Wikipedia ("ARINC 743A defines a GNSS receiver") so there should be no mysterious proprietary protocols here. This would allow compatibility with the NavWorx ADS600-B. I guess I messed up by not fully understanding everything prior to pulling the trigger. I purchased the AXP340 to try to go the Avidyne ADS-B route which I'm now seeing I should not have done. I'm disappointed about how Avidyne touted connectivity and how they don't play the proprietary game, yet they won't do things like output a standard GPS protocol or participate in a combo STC. In the end those are good words, but the story is the same as the other guy. Either I have to pay for a second WAAS GPS or go with an Avidyne solution - I feel like I was duped into thinking the 540 would be compatible with other solutions. Since Avidyne is single band, the ADS600-B would have given me the same capability for less. Sorry for the curmudgeon attitude, but hopefully you can use this as background info on customer feedback.
|
||||||||||||||
MysticCobra
Senior Member Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Status: Offline Points: 649 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Simpson, you're missing the point. Your product line may be "complete", in that it technically covers what folks are asking for, but the TAS systems is not priced competitively for the recreational pilot with a $30-50K plane. TAS is a fantastic product. It's just not what Joe Sixpack is going to be able to afford, so it might as well not exist for those potential customers. In that sense, your product line has a hole in it.
|
||||||||||||||
AviSimpson
Senior Member Joined: 31 Mar 2015 Location: Lincoln, MA Status: Offline Points: 765 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I haven't heard any mention on partnerships on this front. We've worked with other vendors in the past regarding connectivity with their products on other projects.
Yes, like previously posted by Jake, we do support the Capstone protocol however, each vendor has their own "flavor" or interpretation of it. This makes it impossible to have one protocol that covers it all.
Each pairing of a GPS WAAS source and transponder/transceiver needs an AML STC per the FAA. I'm unaware of any other vendor that has reached out asking to use the IFD540/440 as a position source for their transponder/transceiver. |
||||||||||||||
Simpson Bennett
Avidyne Corporation Product Manager |
||||||||||||||
SB Jim
Senior Member Joined: 30 Aug 2012 Status: Offline Points: 204 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Hi David,
Yes, the next big avionics item for me is (probably) an Aspen PFD 1000 Pro to drive my Century III autopilot. After that I'll save up for a DFC 90 as my trusty C-III won't last forever. In that hierarchy the active traffic system is a distant 3rd. Still, I'd really enjoy having one as that will provide the most traffic info. (although still not all traffic). But if I can pick up a dual band receiver and get it installed reasonably that would be worth having. Regards, Jim |
||||||||||||||
oskrypuch
Senior Member Joined: 09 Nov 2012 Location: CYFD Status: Offline Points: 3058 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
I too would add, that I love my 540. for me, three places for charts. I use the Jepp android app to display charts on my Tab S, that kind of replaces my old "paper" chart. I will select the chart on my 796 (gizmo mount in the co-pilot stack), and then I always select the expected approach in the 540. That switches it to airport view when you land. The 796 & 540 both georeference, and the 540 even draws the flightplan over the chart. * Orest |
||||||||||||||
comancheguytoo
Newbie Joined: 17 Apr 2015 Location: CA Status: Offline Points: 29 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
+1 for Bellanca guy Simpson.
I had committed to purchasing an MLB-100 with Pacific Coast, but I've just canceled my pre-order. Since 540/340 owners represent the relatively narrow market for the MLB-100 in the majority, that may become a theme. Displaying TIS/FIS on the 540 would have been redundant, but I was willing to spend the money to get the TIS part as an extra feature on my 540. If, however, my iPad with a portable solution sees stuff the 540 in a certified form won't, kind of seems pointless to purchase the MLB. May only be consumer perception, but judging from the forum responses, I suspect others feel that way as well. Again, thanks for the clarification and responses. Just want to participate as an investor in Avidyne equipment. |
||||||||||||||
brou0040
Senior Member Joined: 13 Dec 2012 Location: KIYK Status: Offline Points: 720 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Do you have plans to display traffic or weather on the 540 via a non-Avidyne dual-band solution? The 540 was touted to be able to display data from other sources (capstone). I was disappointed when Avidyne didn't sign up to allow the 540 to be used as a WAAS source for other companies products (I thought it should have been due to the touted common protocols). Now the only path to dual band is via TAS$$$. I really hope Avidyne decides to support everybody's capstone instead of playing the ours/theirs game because I signed up for a unit that was going to be able to display traffic without having to invest in TAS$$$.
Edited by brou0040 - 21 Apr 2015 at 9:02pm |
||||||||||||||
ddgates
Senior Member Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Deer Valley Status: Offline Points: 1100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Tom:
I like Jepp plates. The plates on the 540 are Jepp. With that, I also have Jepp's FD iPad app - so I can see plates on the 540 and on the iPad. I plan to let my Aspen plate subscription expire when it runs out. David
|
||||||||||||||
David Gates
|
||||||||||||||
bellanca1730a
Groupie Joined: 04 Jul 2013 Location: Tampa Status: Offline Points: 63 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Simpson,
While I had been planning to install an MLB-100, I am now planning to wait for a dual-in box, given the limitations of the MLB-100 recently discussed here. My vote is for a higher priority to the dual-in box. I do appreciate the company's interest in our feedback. Respectfully, |
||||||||||||||
Sean Andrews
Bellanca Super Viking |
||||||||||||||
n7ifr
Senior Member Joined: 05 Aug 2013 Location: Scottsdale, Az Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Dave,
I assume you love your 540. I am about to have mine installed soon. Where do you display Approach Plates? - on your 540, iPad, if not Aspen MFD? Tom W. DVT
|
||||||||||||||
Post Reply | Page <1234 5> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |