Avidyne Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Avidyne General > TAS600 Systems and ADS-B
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - OK, nearly end of summer
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

OK, nearly end of summer

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
ansond View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 145
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ansond Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Nov 2017 at 9:42am
Well.... I guess I have to disagree... the symbology (60 second "tail", target direction in particular) I used quite a bit to sequence between two C-130s during hurricane harvey relief flights into Beaumont...

I do care less about N-numbers (though it IS a nice confirmation to match targets to those ATC calls out...)... but that 60 second "tail" is particularly important... esp for fast aircraft in your area. 

Doug
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Nov 2017 at 8:47am
In Europe there are clouds and we fly in them. In clouds you can’t see out. I had actually assumed that most of this conversation was about IFR/IMC, though in fact TAS and ADS-B are much better at acquiring other aircraft than eyes, which are specifically designed to filter out the most threatening targets.

But I do agree that the extended information is largely useless, which is why the Garmin situation is a world away from the Avidyne one.
Back to Top
Stiletto1 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stiletto1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Nov 2017 at 7:05am
Originally posted by Gring Gring wrote:

Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

Don’t worry about me, there is no incoming damage

In the Garmin case you know it’s there and can avoid it, but suffer the indignity of not knowing whether it’s JetBlue or AA you’ve missed, in the Avidyne case you just merrily pile on into it ;-)


I usually look out the window. Been doing that for awhile now. Seems to work pretty well...

Oh my!  

I hope no one is spending that much time looking up the type and call sign of an ADSB target (who cares?), rather than looking out the window and taking evasive action. 

How did we ever get along with out all this technology.  With that little tidbit from Timothy, it seems to me ADSB could be responsible for just as many accidents as it may save.




C310C
Back to Top
Gring View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 30 Dec 2011
Location: Kingston, NY
Status: Offline
Points: 720
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gring Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Nov 2017 at 6:39am
Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

Don’t worry about me, there is no incoming damage

In the Garmin case you know it’s there and can avoid it, but suffer the indignity of not knowing whether it’s JetBlue or AA you’ve missed, in the Avidyne case you just merrily pile on into it ;-)


I usually look out the window. Been doing that for awhile now. Seems to work pretty well...
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Nov 2017 at 2:48am
Don’t worry about me, there is no incoming damage!

Actually, knowing that I can hit back and don’t just have to suck up whatever a big multinational does to me, but that I can do something effective in return, makes me feel much better than I would as a worm being trodden on!

Do none of the rest of you feel powerless and resentful when Verizon, Apple or whoever screws you over and you can do nothing? Does it not lift your feeling of self-worth if you can step out from under the heel of the oppressor?

Come on guys! Nearly everyone here is a highly successful American citizen, right? Is not your great country built on a sense of individual worth and self-actualisation? Let the Sheeple rise! :-D   Historically, it has not taken a Brit to tell you that :-D

And Avidyne’s complete silence only makes matters worse. If I knew for certain that they had wound up the project, I could book in to get a Garmin transponder fitted and forget the whole situation, but as things stand I am like a rabbit in the headlights, not knowing which way to jump.

Regarding the Garmin situation, I don’t fully understand it, but it would seem that you get the TCAS symbol from ADS-B, which is therefore much more accurately placed than a XPNDR derived return, and appropriate traffic warnings. What you are missing is things like callsign and RoC/RoD. This is a couple of orders of magnitude down from the Avidyne situation, where you don’t get to see the ADS-B return at all.

In the Garmin case you know it’s there and can avoid it, but suffer the indignity of not knowing whether it’s JetBlue or AA you’ve missed, in the Avidyne case you just merrily pile on into it ;-)
Back to Top
LANCE View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 06 Dec 2014
Location: TEXAS
Status: Offline
Points: 277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LANCE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Nov 2017 at 12:16am
Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

Originally posted by LANCE LANCE wrote:

Time to move on.

The time to move on is when Avidyne deliver on their promises, in my opinion.

How long does one accept silence before one just gives up and "moves on", in your opinion?

Long before now. 

This is doing you much more damage than it's doing Avidyne. Keeping resentment alive is like drinking poison and hoping the other person dies. Let it go and find something productive in which to channel that energy.


Edited by LANCE - 13 Nov 2017 at 12:20am
Back to Top
ddgates View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Deer Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 1100
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ddgates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Nov 2017 at 1:41pm
Yep, sounds similar.
David Gates
Back to Top
Stiletto1 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stiletto1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Nov 2017 at 12:06pm
I don't have a dog in this hunt, but found it interesting that right in the middle of my entering this discussion I stumbled across a similar discussion about G having the same kinds of problems getting their GTS software updated for ADSB.  I don't know what Timothy is looking at on his.

Here's more of the discussion on BT re: GTS800 software v4.0 STC update:

-------------------------------------
On July 17, 2017
Q: Just bumping this thread. Has anyone heard any update about when the STC may be approved to allow installation of version 4.0 on the GTS 800? I understand that the update includes features that Garmin was advertising when I bought my GTS 800 unit three years ago. Others have been waiting even longer. It would be nice to close the wounds this issue caused so they can heal.
G-reply: Unfortunately found a problem that needs to be addressed in the software. will push this release out a bit, but hopeful to have this completed soon.

July 18, 2017
Q: What is the nature of the problem found? Roughly how much longer until it is released again?
G-Reply: Can't give exact details on it, but can tell you it won't pass certification testing with the problem. the team is working on it as quickly as possible but having to correct it and go back through the testing process

Oct 28 2017
Q: Now three months later. Anyone got an update?
G-Reply:  No reply as of Nov 12
----------------------------

Sound Familiar?

I think it is now quite clear that Avidyne is not the only avionics manufacturer to suffer these kinds of delays.



C310C
Back to Top
ddgates View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Deer Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 1100
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ddgates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Nov 2017 at 9:29am
Stiletto:

Just for the sake of completeness, AviSimpson has already put it out there that at least for the TAS-A series, at least the initial pass on display will have TCAS and not ADS-B symbology, but did say that the RS-232 output would make the other information available (Squawk code, direction vector/trend, etc).  It will then be up to the display vendor's code to request and display that data.  I also understood that the IFD displays would not be compliant in that respect:

Quote:

- Any display that works with TAS or TAS-A now should work with TAS-A after the ADS-B updates.

· The ARINC-429 interface currently being used (ARINC-735 TCAS format) will continue to work, but will not show additional ADS-B data (ADS-B targets will be displayed, but they will look the same).

· The current RS-232 interface will also remain unchanged. ADS-B targets will be displayed, but they will look the same.

· The RS-232 interface will be updated so that display manufacturers can update their software to request additional ADS-B data. In this case direction, flight ID and on-ground status for ADS-B targets will be provided on the interface.

EndQuote
David Gates
Back to Top
Stiletto1 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stiletto1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Nov 2017 at 9:54pm
Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

Originally posted by Stiletto1 Stiletto1 wrote:

Just FYI, a comment clipped from a post on BeechTalk today:

"I would like my GTS800 to display ADS-B symbology as promised back in 2014, and I am still waiting for this."

That seems odd, as GTS800 has ADS-B in and ADS-B symbology and has for some time.  I have it in my "other" aircraft.  (Once bitten, twice shy.)

It works like a dream, with all the relevant information squitted by the target being visible, so I wonder what has happened in that case?

I have no idea what the circumstances are.  They were discussing the value of upgrading from a G500 to the new Txi - this poster had a G500 and couldn't justify tearing everything up for the new Txi, but would like ADSB symbology for his GTS as promised... to finish out his avionics suite.


C310C
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Nov 2017 at 5:55pm
Originally posted by Stiletto1 Stiletto1 wrote:

Just FYI, a comment clipped from a post on BeechTalk today:

"I would like my GTS800 to display ADS-B symbology as promised back in 2014, and I am still waiting for this."

That seems odd, as GTS800 has ADS-B in and ADS-B symbology and has for some time.  I have it in my "other" aircraft.  (Once bitten, twice shy.)

It works like a dream, with all the relevant information squitted by the target being visible, so I wonder what has happened in that case?
Back to Top
Stiletto1 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stiletto1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Nov 2017 at 4:38pm
Just FYI, a comment clipped from a post on BeechTalk today:

"I would like my GTS800 to display ADS-B symbology as promised back in 2014, and I am still waiting for this."
C310C
Back to Top
Catani View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 21 Jan 2016
Status: Offline
Points: 362
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catani Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Nov 2017 at 11:10am
IFR flights without IFR flight plans are allowed in uncontrolled airspace in the US as well, although it's pretty reckless IMHO to do that here or anywhere where GA air traffic is dense.

It's much more costly to fly a GA aircraft in Europe or the UK than in it is in the US, and the GA fleet and numbers of GA pilots in Europe are tiny compared to the US.  The idea that there is airspace anywhere in Europe that manages to create a widespread area with a higher density of general aviation traffic than the densest airspace in US seems right up there with a Big Foot sighting.
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Nov 2017 at 7:13pm
Originally posted by LANCE LANCE wrote:

Time to move on.

The time to move on is when Avidyne deliver on their promises, in my opinion.

How long does one accept silence before one just gives up and "moves on", in your opinion?
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Nov 2017 at 6:59pm
Originally posted by DavidBunin DavidBunin wrote:

Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

You soon recognize an airspace that is pretty much unknown anywhere else in the world.

I encourage you to experience flight in the LA basin on a nice day.

Is there no flight following and is IFR/IMC permitted without a plan or clearance?
Back to Top
DavidBunin View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2015
Location: Rockwall, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 742
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DavidBunin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Nov 2017 at 11:10am
Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

You soon recognize an airspace that is pretty much unknown anywhere else in the world.

I encourage you to experience flight in the LA basin on a nice day.

David Bunin

Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Nov 2017 at 10:04am
Originally posted by LANCE LANCE wrote:

I think whatever point he was trying to make was made 20 posts ago. Time to move on.

+1
Back to Top
LANCE View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 06 Dec 2014
Location: TEXAS
Status: Offline
Points: 277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LANCE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Nov 2017 at 8:48am
I think whatever point he was trying to make was made 20 posts ago. Time to move on.
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 9:17pm
Originally posted by Stiletto1 Stiletto1 wrote:

...I get it now, though I think Timothy should be a bit more careful in how he characterizes the situation.

Agreed. I think in the thrust for some sort of personal vendetta, which he states that he is proud of, he may be forsaking fully honest reporting. That could very well be a disserivce to his own clients.

* Orest



Edited by oskrypuch - 10 Nov 2017 at 12:05am
Back to Top
Stiletto1 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stiletto1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 8:50pm
Ahh... 

Timothy kept talking about transponders, vouchers, promissory notes, deposits, etc., so I was confused.

So the real complaint is that some of you bought a TAS600 based on the promise of future ADSB integration that has yet to materialize.

I get it now, though I think Timothy should be a bit more careful in how he characterizes the situation.








 




 
C310C
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 5:52pm
Originally posted by Stiletto1 Stiletto1 wrote:

Interesting.  I've never heard of such a thing.

There was a free upgrade offered to the TAS605A, from the TAS605, for a time. I have that upgrade certificate, and look forward to exercising it at some point.


As part of their openness (like this forum, and freely allowing dissenting comments), Avidyne was far more forthcoming about development time frames in the past, and outlining the background process in detail, including when dates slipped. It made for interesting reading. Unfortunately a small vocal minority has hammered Avidyne on the latter, so they have now changed their policy to not announce anything until it is shipping, like most other companies. Too bad.

Granted that this project is taking a rather unusual length of time to complete, but it is not like the product isn't in the field (and in my panel), it is, it is just missing its 1090 ADS-B integration. 

All that said, I expect that the only new, official news on this will simply be "It is available and shipping". Don't think there is much more to say on this topic.

* Orest



Edited by oskrypuch - 09 Nov 2017 at 7:25pm
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 5:28pm
No, the TAS605 was sold with an upgrade certificate to TAS605A which,at the time, was going to have ADS-B in, but that never happened.

That is what this thread is about.
Back to Top
ddgates View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Deer Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 1100
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ddgates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 5:26pm
All who bought units in that time frame were given a "coupon" redeemable for a TAS-A unit when approved.  It turns out that means a unit exchange.

Additionally, owners who had TAS units from before were offered a #2K upgrade to TAS-A under the same terms.

The unit is approved.  The software is not complete, and therein lies the rub.


Edited by ddgates - 09 Nov 2017 at 5:30pm
David Gates
Back to Top
Stiletto1 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stiletto1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 4:05pm
Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

I didn’t pay a deposit. I had to decide between Garmin and Avidyne on a new install. I was told that Garmin already had ADS-B but was relatively expensive, and that Avidyne was just as good, cheaper and would be adding ADS-B, free of charge, very soon and would issue a promissory note to that effect.

Foolishly, knowing much less about Avidyne then than I do now, I went the Avidyne route, got the voucher and waited.

<snip>

So, it’s wrong to describe it as a return of deposit, and I apologise for being lazy in my description, but that is a full description.

Interesting.  I've never heard of such a thing.

So; Avidyne, or was it the installer, gave you a promissory note, or a voucher, for a free ADSB transponder with installation, should you decide to purchase an IFD at a time when they did not offer an ADSB transponder, on the basis that they were developing an ADSB transponder and would provide one to you free of charge when it became available - of which you were lead to believe would be delivered within some reasonable amount of time?

That's amazing!  How specific was that voucher? I'd love to read it.






C310C
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 11:56am
I didn’t pay a deposit. I had to decide between Garmin and Avidyne on a new install. I was told that Garmin already had ADS-B but was relatively expensive, and that Avidyne was just as good, cheaper and would be adding ADS-B, free of charge, very soon and would issue a promissory note to that effect.

Foolishly, knowing much less about Avidyne then than I do now, I went the Avidyne route, got the voucher and waited.

That wait has now turned into a joke.

If I had done my due diligence properly, I would have found out how free Avidyne is with their promises and how easy they are with breaking them, but in my innocence I took the installer’s word for it and went ahead.

When it became clear that they were going to renege on their promises, certainly in timescale, but now, it would seem, in totality, I started advising people against buying Avidyne. I have a lot of face-to-face contact with IFR pilots because I am seen as something of an expert on PBN, and PBN is the “next big thing” in Europe. I agree that railing on forums doesn’t gain much traction, and I don’t do it much, unless people are specifically asking whether they should go GNS upgrade, GTN or IFD (a very common question in Europe as PBN compliance becomes mandatory).

Word got back to Avidyne that I was briefing against them, and indeed they knew about a number of specific lost sales, and they “made me an offer” and “appealed to my humanity.”

So, it’s wrong to describe it as a return of deposit, and I apologise for being lazy in my description, but that is a full description.
Back to Top
ddgates View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Deer Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 1100
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ddgates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 9:27am
I think very little is accomplished by bashing Avidyne on their own discussion board.

Perhaps I've missed it, but does G* even have a discussion board?

I've been, and remain, critical of a business strategy of announcing and "pre-selling" a product which does not exist and isn't even clearly in the mist.  That strategy maybe sold a few more units, but created a modicum of animus, and exposed the fact that the company has limited resources and cannot turn on a dime.

That said, G* has done it.  They did it with their own TAS, for example.

Aspen did the same for even more years with their "ADS-B solutions", and ended up their only offering was a rebranded single frequency unit, as well as pushing somebody else's products.

I do think Avi should definitively address their position on completion and delivery of TAS-A units, and if they cannot fulfill the commitment, come to some reasonable accommodation with purchasers.

Then we should all move on.






Edited by ddgates - 09 Nov 2017 at 9:28am
David Gates
Back to Top
Stiletto1 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stiletto1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 8:53am
Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

They offered me approximately $2000 to relieve them of their obligation. 

Was that $2000.00 offer more than the amount of your original deposit?
C310C
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 8:06am
I like the idea that I, the little guy, can "bully" a multi million dollar US Corporation.  I am proud even to have been noticed by them ;-)

My general rule, when I am being treated like dirt by a corporation, is to ensure that the encounter costs them at least 100x what it has cost me.  

I have achieved this goal many times, indeed, I think, every time I have tried.  

It started when I was given a spurious parking fine by my local council, and they wouldn't revoke it, although they agreed it was illegal. That cost them £4000 ($5000) in lost sponsorship. 

Then there was getting Vodafone to build a cellular mast because they promised coverage where there wasn't any and VirginMedia to build a new exchange because their internet speeds were well below advertised, Zurich Insurance to pay substantial damages on the court steps and so on.

I don't consider it wasting a lot of time and energy so much as having fun while reminding corporations that they cannot always assume that they can treat their customers like mindless cattle who will suffer whatever indignity is heaped on them.  One needs to offset the asymmetry of power.

Avidyne seem to think that they can have people take big financial decisions based on their promises, and then to break the promises and the punters will just roll over and say "never mind".  I'd like them to know that it's not OK.

They offered me approximately $2000 to relieve them of their obligation.  That would not come anywhere near the cost of putting in a GTX345, and anyway, that is not the point, they need to learn to take the consequences of their behaviour, which was, after all, to take our money under false pretences.

At the moment, the only consequence is my doing a big anti-sell on them at my PBN seminars all over Europe, but as those seminars are largely attended by private owners and schools who want to move to RNAV/RNP/PBN, it is what you might call a "target rich environment" ;-)

It does seem that they have completely shelved the whole project and don't know how to announce it :-(
Back to Top
Stiletto1 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stiletto1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2017 at 8:46pm
Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

Originally posted by Stiletto1 Stiletto1 wrote:

Fact is my plane is going in early spring for a new stack.  Would be nice if Avidyne had a dual band in competitor to the GTX345R by then.

After all that you have read on here, why would that stack be Avidyne, or have any Avidyne equipment?  I have overseen two new stacks over the last year.  GTN750, GTN650 and in one case Aspen, the other G600.  Both have WX500, Garmin Mode S, Garmin audio panel.  Both have been faultless and "just worked".  

Why would you buy into all the overheating problems, certification issues and after-sales issues that you know you are going to get from Avidyne?

That Avidyne has had trouble with the TAS600A development is hardly enough for me to discount the rest of their product line.  Fact is Garmin is not without it's own development problems and share of detractors.

Would I have made the same product development and marketing decisions that Avidyne has?  Probably not.  Was it wise of Garmin to have orphaned the GNS navigators and forced a complete new rack installation of incompatible equipment?  Genius decision, that one.

I'm no fan boy for either brand and can go either way.  I prefer the IFD FMS over the GTN - no contest.  I prefer the redundant WAAS, BT, and dual band-in of the GTX345R and its' integration with the GTN over the Avidyne offering.  It's a tough call, but for all the reasons I mentioned previously I can wait for a dual band in solution. 

Avidyne has been unable to provide you with a product that did not exist at the time you ordered it and has offered to refund your deposit. You chose not to accept it and have instead wasted a lot of time and energy attempting to bully them while not enjoying an alternate solution. I find, therefore, no credible bona fides in your attempt to sway my decision.

I hope that answers your question.




Edited by Stiletto1 - 08 Nov 2017 at 9:02pm
C310C
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2017 at 7:09pm
Oh Timothy. You must be reading only your own posts.

If I bought a plane with a GTN, I'd pull it and install an IFD. It is a so much better designed unit. Delighted with my "A" equipment, for quite a number of years now.

But, I respect your right to choose. If you don't like the A stuff, pull it, and get on with life.

* Orest



Edited by oskrypuch - 08 Nov 2017 at 7:41pm
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2017 at 6:04pm
Originally posted by Stiletto1 Stiletto1 wrote:

Fact is my plane is going in early spring for a new stack.  Would be nice if Avidyne had a dual band in competitor to the GTX345R by then.

After all that you have read on here, why would that stack be Avidyne, or have any Avidyne equipment?  I have overseen two new stacks over the last year.  GTN750, GTN650 and in one case Aspen, the other G600.  Both have WX500, Garmin Mode S, Garmin audio panel.  Both have been faultless and "just worked".  

Why would you buy into all the overheating problems, certification issues and after-sales issues that you know you are going to get from Avidyne?
Back to Top
Stiletto1 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stiletto1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2017 at 10:33am
Thank you both for the education on foreign airspace issues.

Timothy, regarding the UK issues: You are correct that I would not call the problem there non-existent based upon what you have described.  Looks to me like the CAA needs to get a handle on a traffic control standard.

My theater of operations is not nearly that problematic.  So long as there are so many aircraft not required to even have a transponder outside of rule airspace up to 10k', I'll be placing the bulk of my traffic awareness investment in ATC.

Now, if it were to be mandated here in the states that anything operating above say 3000agl must be equipped with at least ADSB-out you could count me all in for a dual band ADSB-in solution.

Fact is my plane is going in early spring for a new stack.  Would be nice if Avidyne had a dual band in competitor to the GTX345R by then.


C310C
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2017 at 8:50am
Originally posted by Stiletto1 Stiletto1 wrote:

.... here in the states I would consider TAS to be redundant if not obsolete technology. ...

I would agree that in the US the value of TAS has greatly diminished with the prevalence of US TIS-B. But do remember that the US is the only place in the world that has such an animal. Up to Avidyne (and Garmin) to evaluate the business case for production.

But TCAS is a whole different universe, and a separate discussion. It is not going anywhere in the near future.

Speaking to flying in Canada, you are very soon out of radar coverage as you depart the major population centers, especially if you stray from airways or fly below 15k or so. For me TAS is a critical safety element north of the border, and as a side benefit it does fill in the blanks in the US as well.

Having ADS-B (re)broadcasts assist localization on the TAS units would be a nice perk, but it is hardly a pivotal issue to me. Even without it, my TAS unit remains in good service. When they finish the software, I've got a free (prepaid) upgrade for my TAS605. 

That makes me a happy camper.

Prime targets, especially those dang gliders, will always remain a really pesky issue.

* Orest



Edited by oskrypuch - 08 Nov 2017 at 8:55am
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2017 at 8:46am
Originally posted by Stiletto1 Stiletto1 wrote:

but I was wondering why you want this system in the first place?

Perhaps things are different in the UK, but here in the states I would consider TAS to be redundant if not obsolete technology.

The place to start might be an understanding of airspace in the UK.  

Firstly, we are permitted to operate IFR/IMC outside controlled airspace, without an FPL and even without radio.  There is no Flight Following service (by right; some private and military agencies offer a discretionary service, but there is no obligation one either party to partake).  

We have a fairly liberal regime with respect to VFR minima, meaning that people can be flying VFR in very marginal conditions.  

We also have a sub-ICAO instrument qualification which allows people with minimal knowledge and skills to fly minimally equipped aircraft in IMC outside controlled airspace, with the fact that they are operating under the IFR not declared outside of their own heads.

Next, add in to that heady mix that traffic in some parts of the UK (most noticeably in the South East) is very dense.   I have just done a little exercise of drawing a circle 50nm around Central London and I count 170 airfields.  Phrased another way, that is an airfield on average every 7nm in any direction.  Those airfields range from one of the busiest airports in the world (Heathrow) through to one of the busiest gliding sites (Lasham) down to rarely used hotel heliports.  Add on to that that if anyone wants to fly from anywhere else - Manchester, Birmingham, Cardiff, Belfast, Dublin, Scotland - to the Continent of Europe, they will fly through the SE of England.

You soon recognise an airspace that is pretty much unknown anywhere else in the world.

Europe has not mandated ADS-B out for most traffic.  Aircraft are flying around in this airspace with a range of equipage from ADS-B Out, Mode S, Mode C, Mode A, Flarm, Powerflarm to nothing.  There is no obligation for most light operators (from parascenders to light twins) to be electronically conspicuous.

However, many light aircraft do carry transponders and many of those include altitude reporting.  Those will be picked up by TAS and not by ADS-B in.

But, as we know, the position derived from the TAS twin aerial approach, though good, is not perfect and it misses stuff, so ADS-B is considerably better.

The UK CAA is having a big push on the "known environment" front, as mentioned in a previous post, and ADS-B out will be heading towards being universal, even on paragliders and Amazon drones.

Quote I would even go so far as to say that both TCAS and ADSB are incomplete solutions

Agreed.

Quote to a non-existent problem.

I trust that you would no longer say that, given what I have written above.

Quote ATC services in the States is free, and ground radar will always see more targets than TCAS or ADSB ever will (we have many non-transponder equipped aircraft here).  With so few areas not within radar coverage, and those areas having such low traffic, most of which are not transponder equipped in the first place, one wonders what all the hubbub with TAS, TCAS, ADSB-in is about.

Much of this is not true of the UK.

Quote PS: If I was the CEO of Avidyne, I would drop the TAS project, admit defeat, and refund any deposits taken. Resources would be better spent developing a competitor to the GTX345(R)

They offered to refund my deposit if I would shut up, and I declined.  

only if they replace my TAS605 with the Garmin equivalent, supplied and fitted, or have a GTX345 fitted to my aircraft, will I shut up.  

This is not about the $2000 or whatever the upgrade is said to be worth, it is about a whole decision chain that has ended up with my not having ADS-B nearly four years after Avidyne promised it and charged me for it.
Back to Top
Stiletto1 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stiletto1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2017 at 7:05am
Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

I will simply cross post from another forum:

Quote T., I’ve just had this done (with TAS600and GTX345) and NYCYankee is correct: the TAS600 feeds into the GTX which merges its traffic with ADSB-in.
This is then displayed on the GTNs and the iPad via Bluetooth.


Appreciate your business concerns, but I was wondering why you want this system in the first place?

Perhaps things are different in the UK, but here in the states I would consider TAS to be redundant if not obsolete technology.  I would even go so far as to say that both TCAS and ADSB are incomplete solutions to a non-existent problem.  ATC services in the states is free, and ground radar will always see more targets than TCAS or ADSB ever will (we have many non-transponder equipped aircraft here).  With so few areas not within radar coverage, and those areas having such low traffic, most of which are not transponder equipped in the first place, one wonders what all the hubbub with TAS, TCAS, ADSB-in is about.

PS: If I was the CEO of Avidyne, I would drop the TAS project, admit defeat, and refund any deposits taken. Resources would be better spent developing a competitor to the GTX345(R)  


Edited by Stiletto1 - 08 Nov 2017 at 7:13am
C310C
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Oct 2017 at 4:51am
I will simply cross post from another forum:

Quote T., I’ve just had this done (with TAS600and GTX345) and NYCYankee is correct: the TAS600 feeds into the GTX which merges its traffic with ADSB-in.
This is then displayed on the GTNs and the iPad via Bluetooth.

So now at least that there is a way out using good ol' reliable Garmin.   That takes the pressure of my need to get equipped within the next year.

However, the lying, unreliability, arrogance, incompetence and general poor business practises of Avidyne will never be forgotten.  I am lucky enough to have a big voice, because of all the RNAV/PBN seminars I give, the articles I write, the trade shows I have booths at, the meetings I have with CAA, UK Government and EASA.

I will ensure that no opportunity is missed.

And Avidyne's failure will not be down to me, but down to them.
Back to Top
ddgates View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Deer Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 1100
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ddgates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Oct 2017 at 4:03pm
Sir, many of us have the same dilemma.  FWIW, there haven't been many more vocal that me in chiding Avidyne to prioritize this promise made, I believe, 5 or 6 years ago, and as yet unfulfilled.

-nagging doesn't produce results
-damage to company image doesn't produce results
-apparently lost sales doesn't produce results

I personally would note that the company's CEO has never uttered a word on this board.  To me that speaks volumes.

What say you?
David Gates
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Oct 2017 at 3:44pm
So, do I just give up, buy a Garmin GTX 345 and spend the rest of my aviation writing and lecturing life sl*gging off Avidyne?

Will the GTX 345 plug into the back of the TAS 605, the way it does with Garmin TAS products?
Back to Top
ddgates View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Deer Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 1100
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ddgates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Oct 2017 at 10:37am
Experience suggests that our "barristers" will take on class actions where :

1.  There complainant pool is huge
-or-
2.  Where deaths are involved.

Examples are Asbestos in the US (example 2) or Amazon book overcharges (example 1).

In either event, the aggregate $$ amount must be large.

This situation meets neither of the above.




Edited by ddgates - 25 Oct 2017 at 10:38am
David Gates
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Oct 2017 at 7:52am
How long do we leave it until we just assume that work has stopped on this?

Time for a Class Action?  I don't really know how that works in the States, how many people it takes, and whether Europeans can join in.
Back to Top
DavidBunin View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2015
Location: Rockwall, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 742
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DavidBunin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Oct 2017 at 7:50pm
Originally posted by ansond ansond wrote:

I do realize that Garmin has an ODA.  

Why doesn't Avidyne? 

Would it be possible for Avidyne to try to hire an ODA or train one of their current employees to become the company's ODA? Would that be possible?


ODA = Organization Designation Authorization

It is an approval of an organization (a company or facility) not an individual.  You can't hire one, and you can't train a person to become one.  It is a process, and it is a process that can takes years or even decades.  It normally goes like this:

A company does their first certification project.  The do the certification with the FAA "directly" although they often hire a DER or two to help shepherd them through their end of the process.  With any luck, the application goes well and approval is forthcoming and the FAA is impressed with the applicant.

On the next project (or after a few projects) the applicant has grown as a company and has a DER (or better yet, several) on staff within the facility.  The FAA is still the final word, but trust is building for the internal DER(s) to handle minor decisions and more of the paperwork on behalf of the feds.  Side note: To become a DER, one has to be recommended or "sponsored" by at least two FAA employees.  So one does not become a DER overnight or without extensive qualifications.  In other words, these are all old men.  No new, young or out-of-the-box thinking allowed.  These people know very well how to do things by-the-book.

After lots of successful certification projects, and more trust built with the overseeing FAA office, the applicant creates an internal but separated piece of the organization (like quality control).  Lots of DER staff, lots of trust with the FAA, and (like the individual DER) a letter or two of recommendation for an ODA.  Then the approval process begins.

In other words, getting an ODA can be a years-long or even decade-long process.

I believe that the ODA of UPSAT was one of the unspoken reasons that Garmin bought them.  Or did nobody else notice that Garmin's ODA is in Oregon and not Kansas?

Back to Top
PeterC View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 30 Jul 2015
Location: CYKZ
Status: Offline
Points: 86
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PeterC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 10:42am
I, too was sold a 605A with a software update "coming".  Where is it?
Peter - 1977 Cardinal RG C-FJPC - IFD550/540/240/322/605A/Skytrax100, Aspen MAX 2000, Trio A/P
Back to Top
ddgates View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Deer Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 1100
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ddgates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 9:21am
Originally posted by Timothy Nathan Timothy Nathan wrote:

...electronic conspicuity, whereby everything which flies either has feathers or squits its position on ADS-B.


Like the description...<G>

It is unfathomable to me that, if nothing else, company pride and image didn't propel this widely announced project/feature set to completion.

And yet, I don't see an escalation path.

EDIT: Read Jake's post from > 1 year ago upthread.  I feel your pain...


Edited by ddgates - 19 Oct 2017 at 9:23am
David Gates
Back to Top
Timothy Nathan View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Timothy Nathan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Oct 2017 at 9:09am
As far as I can tell, there has been no response from Avidyne.   Do we need to conclude that they have terminated the project?

ADS-B is becoming a huge topic in the UK. The UK CAA is running a massive project to develop universal electronic conspicuity, whereby everything which flies either has feathers or squits its position on ADS-B.i

I shall need ADS-B In quite shortly. Should I just give up on Avidyne and buy a suitable Garmin transponder?

It would, of course, close all doors on any opportunity for Avidyne to get me back on board, and having me disgruntled is costing them a lot of sales as I give more and more PBN seminars in the lead up to next year’s big bang in Europe, and tell the many attendees that they should avoid Avidyne equippage when getting PBN compliant.
Back to Top
Ibraham View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 21 May 2016
Location: KHWO
Status: Offline
Points: 357
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ibraham Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Oct 2017 at 3:17pm
Regardless of the issue, a company should not advertise a product or feature before it is certified or within days of certification.
Back to Top
ddgates View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Deer Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 1100
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ddgates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Oct 2017 at 2:48pm
Pardon a suggestion.

The issue isn't an ODA.  The issue is "Is the package completed and ready for submission"?

I don't know but would bet it isn't the FAA holding this up for 4-5 years.
David Gates
Back to Top
ansond View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 145
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ansond Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Oct 2017 at 1:01pm
Originally posted by tony tony wrote:

So I'm guessing you have no experience certifying software with the FAA.  Its an eye opening, extremely frustrating, ordeal if you do not have an ODA in place.  So before we start comparing Garmin to Avidyne, Garmin has an ODA.  Avidyne does not.  I'm sure Avidyne is just as frustrated as everyone else. 


No, I don't have any experience in certifying software with the FAA... and I would never claim that I did nor that its "easy" by any stretch...

So, I do realize that Garmin has an ODA.  

Why doesn't Avidyne? 

Would it be possible for Avidyne to try to hire an ODA or train one of their current employees to become the company's ODA? Would that be possible? If it were possible, would it make sense to invest for it to happen - esp. if that's "the" primary holdup?

Seems to me that'd be a slam dunk "yes"... don't allow a competitor to have this kind of advantage if at all possible. 

Back to Top
tony View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Dec 2011
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tony Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Oct 2017 at 9:24am

So I'm guessing you have no experience certifying software with the FAA.  Its an eye opening, extremely frustrating, ordeal if you do not have an ODA in place.  So before we start comparing Garmin to Avidyne, Garmin has an ODA.  Avidyne does not.  I'm sure Avidyne is just as frustrated as everyone else. 



Edited by tony - 13 Oct 2017 at 9:26am
Back to Top
ansond View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 145
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ansond Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2017 at 2:29pm
As someone who has approx 25 years specifically in the software development arena, Avidyne's delays and clarity issues in their release roadmaps/activities are indeed a bit worrisome. They seem to be prone to significant delays without reasonable cause that they are willing to reveal. 

Don't get me wrong - I love my Avidyne stuff... its great... I would offer this as suggestive/constructive and not inflammatory... I care.

For the EXP5000C and its adaptation of the SkyTrax data... it actually does not surprise me that it's taking along time... From what I gather, the 5000C runs Windows NT 4.0 SP5 as the underlying kernel/OS... which, if I am correct, is stone-ages ancient... I would honestly be surprised if there was any form of support available for it anymore.  It's just a guess, but perhaps Avidyne is having to rewrite a good bit of code (possibly including putting it on a more current/supportable/recent OS?) to do any sort of augmentation to that platform...  

I am hoping for a new OS that is way more current. 

... mostly because I don't even want to think about security concerns of the 5000C... luckily that box does not connect to anything starting with an "I" ;-)... NT4.0SP5 is so old that it predates literally all of the changes that happened at/within MS around security and their OSes... my guess is that its totally exposed and unprotected... no way can it/should it be connected to a network of any form imo...additionally I do everything I can to make sure that my USB sticks are squeaky,squeaky clean...   

For the IFDs, not having regular cadence of releases is concerning in that it might be indicative of a poor relationship with the FAA and lots of difficulties getting changes through the sanctioned process... just a guess though. 

I doubt that the IFDs have an old OS or are otherwise difficult to physically support... However, that said, one other potential issue might be hindering things involves  "hardware folks grappling with software"... something I see quite a bit in my line of work... may also play a role in the challenges of pinpointing a date for release and having high confidence that you'll make that date with high quality and conformance to release processes. 

Software development rigor is non-trivial (esp. if mandated by government release processes) - it just doesn't "happen".   I do not have direct exposure/experience to Avidyne's software development principles & environment, but I'd hazard a guess that many of the folks working on this product are geeky (cool!!!) hardware-centric-types... Add to that the complexities of dealing with the FAA and I can actually understand why it's taking so long for seemingly simple updates to appear... 

Software will make or break these flight decks... and thus development and release schedule/rigor must be a key part of creating a predictable update cadence/experience...  Hopefully Avidyne & Schwinn realize this necessity. 

Garmin certainly realizes it. It's a software world.  

Looking at the Avidyne company careers site, I don't see a lot of expansion in the software development space - it seems that it's mostly hardware and sales/support... a "canary" perhaps?

I hope this is viewed as constructive... I want Avidyne to succeed!

Doug
Back to Top
Ibraham View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 21 May 2016
Location: KHWO
Status: Offline
Points: 357
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ibraham Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2017 at 11:52am
That was the same for the IFD 10.2 update, and still waiting for the Avidyne EX5000 MFD update to display ADS-B data from Avidyne MLB100 now called Skytrax100.  The Avidyne website states that the traffic and weather will display on the MFD, the update was announced to be ready by 1st quarter 2016, now they are saying 4th quarter 2017, 2 years late and still doubt it will be done by then.
Last update they blamed the snow and weather in Boston last winter, they had over a year and nothing yet, now the winter is almost here and hope they don't blame it on the snow again.

Very frustrating, especially for items that promote safety such as weather and traffic display, which was the whole reason we installed the Skytrax and other Avidyne avionics.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.