Avidyne Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Avidyne General > DFC90/DFC100 Digital Autopilot
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Piper Senec V - DFC90/100
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Piper Senec V - DFC90/100

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
hmagbakk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hmagbakk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Piper Senec V - DFC90/100
    Posted: 05 Oct 2016 at 7:21am
Planning to buy a Piper Seneca V - 2007 With avidyne Entegra, Garmin GNS 430 (non WAAS) and S-Tec55x. I want to Upgrade the Avionic to fly Precision RNAV approaches (Europe) and I know that the S-tec55x might not be the best Choice.

Not sure what kind of solution I will choose, but Wonder if anybody here know if the DFC90 is approved/STC for the Seneca?


Also I need to find out if I should Upgrade GNS430 to WAAS or if I should spend some money changing it with Avidyne ifd 440/540 or Garmin GTN650/750??


I have a few houndred hours from Cirrus SR22T With Garmin G1000 which I am very satisfied to work with and the Garmin autopilot flies everything very well! Hoping to Upgrade the Senece V to something closer/easier to operate like the Cirrus, but of course don't like to spend too much Money. Spent some hours in the older Cirrus With Avidyne/gns430 few years ago as well.

Anybody With thoughts around this?

Thanks!

Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 2272
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Oct 2016 at 8:43am
Not sure why you feel that the STEC 55x would not be up to the task. It is quite a capable A/P. Not a DFC90, but there is no STC for a Seneca for it.

Slipping in an IFD 440 into your current panel would transform it, and it is a very simple and low cost install, although you would have to upgrade the antenna to WAAS.

Given that you have the Entegra, you may not need much more "glass", but if you have the room, a 540 (or 540/440 pair) would be a step up, but would necessitate pulling the panel apart a bit.

* Orest



Edited by oskrypuch - 05 Oct 2016 at 11:18am
Back to Top
hmagbakk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hmagbakk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Oct 2016 at 9:42am

Hi, and thanks Your reply. As far as I remember from the Cirrus With S-Tec55 is that it is not tracking the approaches in windy/gusty conditions and if you have too much speed, this is not really a problem With the modern autopilots which uses AHRS data as Reference. Maybe I am wrong, I will not do anything before start flying the Seneca, but like to check the possibilities in case I need to do the Upgrade.


Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 2272
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Oct 2016 at 11:21am
Attitude driven, versus roll driven A/Ps will indeed track somewhat more accurately in turbulence, but otherwise there is not a lot of difference. A common issue in tracking problems is worn out servos. I didn't think I had a problem with my servos, until one died, and I decided to overhaul all three. What a WORLD of difference that made.

* Orest

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.043 seconds.